The Hechinger Study is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

The living room may not have been what New York City's mayor had in heed a year ago when he ran for re-ballot on the ambitious hope of gratis preschool for all of the city's 3-year-olds.

That door is at present open.

New York Urban center recently introduced a plan that would bring three-Chiliad into dwelling-based childcare. It'southward a move that other cities and districts are likely to watch closely. The school district is the nation's largest. There is no playbook for how to effectively include home-based childcare in public preschool, and nearly programs have relied on schools and centers. (Home-based childcare is likewise known every bit family childcare or group family daycare.)

In a recent report, the Center for New York City Affairs at The New School explored the opportunities and challenges that home-based childcare presents for the city'southward evolving 3-Thousand program. The report identifies goals that a public preschool program might set in a habitation-based environment. Based on conversations with more than than twenty stakeholders and education experts in New York City, the report also looks to other cities and states for lessons.

Related: Quality of pre-K varies in New York, data shows

Adding a disquisitional mass of family unit daycares to this 3-K mix will allow the metropolis to more than easily serve 3-year-olds in neighborhoods where space in schools and childcare centers is tight — and where domicile-based childcare already accounts for the bulk of offerings.

These programs will too give families the option of small, homey settings for very immature children. And if the city finds ways to maintain 3-K family childcare equally mixed-age settings, toddlers in domicile-based childcare will accept the option of staying put for 3-K, allowing for more consistent caregiving and for siblings of different ages to stay together.

At that place are ways this could become wrong. Working in the more loosely regulated, varied and geographically scattered world of home care is a difference from the education department'south electric current pre-Yard portfolio of schools and childcare centers.

Unlike its massive, high-speed launch of universal pre-K for 4-year-olds, the urban center has been introducing iii-1000 gradually, adding a few community schoolhouse districts each year, focusing first on those with high concentrations of poverty. The get-go programs have been in schools and childcare centers.

Related: Universal preschool is most cost-effective, study finds

If family unit daycares or the network organizations that the metropolis's teaching section plans to support them are not themselves adequately supported and compensated, or if standards for them are set also low, these programs could provide sub-standard services to the low-income children that the 3-M initiative is particularly great to benefit. It could too mean that children in under-resourced neighborhoods are taught past the least-qualified teachers.

The metropolis'southward delicate ecosystem of childcare may also suffer — especially on the limited, precious stock of infant care slots. Los Angeles offers a cautionary tale in this regard; it witnessed a loss of infant care when information technology began using family unit childcare for its targeted public pre-K plan.

"Family childcare has long been the most common class of childcare for New York City'south very youngest and poorest children, and the urban center is wise to exist making it an of import function of its early education strategy."

The challenge is to present a vision for what 3-K in family daycare looks similar that is inclusive of a significant number of domicile providers, simply likewise holds them to high standards and offers aplenty supports. To do this, it will need to make careful decisions about what is reasonable to inquire of teachers in the family daycares, and how to help them succeed. It must grapple with philosophical issues, including how much to honor the approaches that abode-based caregivers take developed over years, sometimes decades, of practice, and where the city can advance its own vision of early education.

Through it all, the city must go along careful watch on the larger system of childcare on which working families depend.

In a white paper last month, the city'southward pedagogy department committed to maintaining the urban center'southward chapters of subsidized infant and toddler care. However, a potential loss of infant and toddler slots in family unit childcare resulting from expanding 3-Grand remains a real business concern.

Taking care of babies in family childcare settings costs more than taking care of older kids because of more intensive staffing requirements. Equally a effect, most small providers who take in babies serve mixed historic period groups to make the staffing requirements piece of work. With the advent of free 3-K programs, these family unit childcare providers might lose 3-year-olds and either go out of business organisation or begin providing unregulated intendance.

Allowing them to participate in 3-K, on the other hand, could go a long mode toward helping go along them viable, and also prevent a loss of infant and toddler seats.

At the same time, creating a mixed-aged 3-Grand model specifically for family daycare is probable to show challenging. 3-K has early education objectives that in schools and childcare centers are assumed to be carried out by certified teachers. Teaching requirements for family unit childcare providers accept not yet been specified.

Achieving high-quality early education across all family childcare settings will require paying subsidized providers more and investing in programme improvements. Providers should be able to receive higher rates as they run across quality benchmarks and reach credentials. Many states already provide this kind of tiered payment for subsidized family childcare providers. The system encourages them to pursue professional development and program comeback. New York State should start doing that as well.

Family childcare has long been the near common course of childcare for New York City'southward very youngest and poorest children, and the city is wise to be making information technology an important part of its early education strategy. If Mayor Pecker de Blasio can, every bit promised, protect the precious childcare slots that these programs offering while also infusing them with new funding and resources, information technology will be a huge win for the city. It could likewise serve as a model for the state.

This story well-nigh early childhood education was produced byThe Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in teaching. Sign upward for the Hechinger newsletter .

Kendra Hurley is senior editor at The New Schoolhouse'southward Center for New York Metropolis Diplomacy.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on education that is free to all readers. Merely that doesn't mean it'due south gratuitous to produce. Our work keeps educators and the public informed nigh pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the land. Nosotros tell the whole story, even when the details are inconvenient. Help us proceed doing that.

Bring together united states today.

Kendra Hurley is senior editor at The New School's Applied Policy Research Establish.